More people found work, and sooner, with job-search support

For people with severe mental health conditions, employment increased, but there was no overall improvement in health or quality of life.

How we make these readings

The key idea

Job-search support showed an effect on employment, not an overall improvement in mental health or quality of life.

The study, in plain language

In this program, job search and mental-health treatment proceed in parallel. The review combined trial publications comparing it with usual services; most participants had severe conditions.

More program participants obtained jobs open to the general workforce, and the time to the first job was shorter than with usual services. Measures of how people felt and functioned showed no overall improvement. The review distinguished job opportunities from other personal outcomes.

What they found

  • More program participants obtained jobs open to the general workforce.
  • Time to the first job was shorter with the program.
  • Combined outcomes showed no improvement in mental health, functioning, or quality of life.

Something to think about

A job can provide income, routine, or company. Which of these would you measure to know whether a program like this works?

How they studied it

A review combined results from 30 publications: 25 original trials, two extended follow-ups, and three secondary analyses. It compared a supported-employment program called IPS with usual services, mainly among people with severe mental health conditions.

What the study cannot show

  • Studies differed in duration, measures, and comparison services.
  • IPS does not guarantee a job for every person or automatic improvement in health or quality of life.

The original study

Supported employment: Meta-analysis and review of randomized controlled trials of individual placement and support

PLOS ONE, 14(2), e0212208 · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0212208. Published .

Study authors (1)

Donald E. Frederick; Tyler J. VanderWeele

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212208

Source under CC BY 4.0. English adaptation and explanation by PaperFlow, with AI assistance. The text has been reorganized for a general audience; it is not the complete paper and does not imply endorsement by its authors.

One study alone does not represent a field's consensus. Educational content does not replace professional advice. Report a possible error.