How we choose and explain research papers
An interesting idea is a beginning. Its source and limitations are part of the reading too.
Start with an identifiable source
Every reading links to the original study, preserves its title and authors, and includes a DOI when available. The source lets you check methods, findings and nuances that a short explanation cannot fully reproduce.
Explain a finding without turning it into a promise
Our editing presents the question, research method, findings and limitations. It does not turn an association into a cause or a result into a recommendation for everyone. A study about a habit does not show that PaperFlow changes that habit.
Distinguish the research from the adaptation
The original authors are responsible for their study. PaperFlow adapts and edits the explanation with AI assistance, which can make mistakes. Authorship of a study does not imply collaboration with or endorsement of PaperFlow. The adaptation is not a systematic review or a field's consensus.
Keep the context and limitations
Readings identify the sample, task or setting when those details are available. Limitations appear alongside findings. The study date refers to the original research, not the publication date of our adaptation. English readings use the existing editorial translations of the corresponding Spanish content.
Respect each source's license
The open library uses sources with documented reuse licenses in the editorial catalog. Every reading links to the license and states that the text was adapted and reorganized. Sources with reserved rights, unresolved licenses or incomplete source review are left out. We do not reproduce complete papers or third-party illustrations.
Keep a corrections channel open
If you find an error, a source that has changed, or a claim that misrepresents a study, email us with the reading URL and the passage to review. This content is educational and does not replace medical, psychological, financial or other professional advice.