Fire brought tree numbers closer to historical levels, but not species composition

In simulations of dry forests in Oregon, moderate-severity fire came closest to historical tree abundance. Species composition did not.

How we make these readings

The key idea

Getting close to the historical number of trees does not restore the former forest: tree numbers and species responded differently to fire.

The study, in plain language

The team combined tree data from before and after fires, severity maps, and historical reconstructions. They modeled tree mortality by species and size, then applied the model to current forests. These forests had several times more trees per area than historical references, so simulations tested which fire could bring those values closer.

A relatively narrow band of moderate severity was most likely to bring tree abundance, or the combined cross-sectional area of trunks, closer to historical levels, with variation across sites. However, historical species composition remained altered in mixed-conifer forests and most ponderosa-pine forests. Abundance, combined trunk size, and composition responded differently to simulated fire.

What they found

  • Before simulated fire, current forests had several times more trees than historical references.
  • Moderate-severity fire was most likely to bring tree abundance and trunk area closer to historical levels.
  • Simulated fire did not restore historical species composition in mixed-conifer forests or most ponderosa-pine forests.

How they studied it

Researchers modeled tree mortality in a fire by species and size and applied it to current forests in the region. They then compared surviving trees with historical reconstructions. This was a simulation, not an experiment with real fire.

What the study cannot show

  • The model focuses on dry forests in this region. Trees under 15 cm in diameter were excluded from stand comparisons. It does not represent all processes or a sequence of future fires, and its ranges are not a prescribed burn plan.

Something to think about

When you hear about restoring a forest, ask what is meant to be restored: how many trees, which species, what structure, or how it functions.

The original study

Too hot, too cold, or just right: Can wildfire restore dry forests of the interior Pacific Northwest?

PLOS ONE. Published .

Study authors (7)

Skye M. Greenler, Christopher J. Dunn, James D. Johnston, Matthew J. Reilly, Andrew G. Merschel, R. Keala Hagmann, John D. Bailey

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281927

Source under CC0 1.0. English adaptation and explanation by PaperFlow, with AI assistance. The text has been reorganized for a general audience; it is not the complete paper and does not imply endorsement by its authors.

One study alone does not represent a field's consensus. Educational content does not replace professional advice. Report a possible error.