Video-supervised exercise improved movement tests, but not blood sugar

Among 33 adults with type 2 diabetes, those who trained remotely improved more on movement and sleep tests. Blood sugar did not differ.

How we make these readings

The key idea

Average blood sugar did not change convincingly, but several movement tests and participant-reported sleep favored the training group.

The study, in plain language

Supervision took place by video while participants did aerobic and strength exercises. Over 12 weeks, a trial in Pelotas, Brazil, compared this approach with no program among adults with type 2 diabetes who did not use insulin and were not regularly active. The people assessing and analyzing the data did not know each participant's group.

The primary measure, which reflects blood sugar over the past few months, showed no convincing difference. Some movement tests favored the remote group: standing up from a chair, arm work, moving around, and completing a step test. Participants also reported improved sleep quality. These were secondary outcomes in a small, single-center study, and several people left the program.

What they found

  • Video calls were used to supervise aerobic and strength exercise during sessions.
  • The primary measure of blood sugar over recent months showed no convincing difference between groups.
  • Several movement tests and self-reported sleep favored the program as secondary outcomes.

Something to think about

When a study does not change its primary measure, what else changed? Here, blood sugar did not change convincingly, but some movement tests did. The group was small.

How they studied it

At one center in Pelotas, Brazil, 33 adults aged 45 or older with type 2 diabetes, who did not use insulin and were not regularly active, were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of video-supervised exercise or a comparison group. Researchers measured glycated hemoglobin (blood sugar over recent months), functional capacity, glucose, and psychosocial outcomes. Assessors and analysts were unaware of group assignment.

What the study cannot show

  • The trial was small and took place at one center; five participants in the remote group dropped out. Average blood sugar was already relatively well controlled at baseline, and secondary results should be interpreted cautiously.
  • The study does not show that video-supervised exercise reduces long-term complications or can replace medical care or in-person programs.

The original study

Effects of a Synchronous Telehealth Exercise Program on Clinical, Functional, and Psychosocial Outcomes in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (RED Study): A Randomized Clinical Trial

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 23(6), 773. · DOI 10.3390/ijerph23060773. Published .

Study authors (1)

Samara Nickel Rodrigues; Bruno Veiga Guterres; Maurício Tatsch Ximenes Carvalho; Rodrigo Sudatti Delevatti; Cristine Lima Alberton.

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph23060773

Source under CC BY 4.0. English adaptation and explanation by PaperFlow, with AI assistance. The text has been reorganized for a general audience; it is not the complete paper and does not imply endorsement by its authors.

One study alone does not represent a field's consensus. Educational content does not replace professional advice. Report a possible error.